|  
             Social 
              Security 
            Gender 
              and Economic Security in Retirement 
              Sunwha Lee and Lois Shaw, Institute for Women’s 
              Policy Research (www.iwpr.org). 
              2003. “Despite the gender gap in annual benefits, Social Security 
              is crucial for the economic security of unmarried women who live 
              alone at ages 65 and over. Without Social Security benefits, more 
              than two-thirds of unmarried women living alone would fall into 
              poverty.” 35 pages in PDF 
            Social 
              Security and Women 
              The Economic Policy Institute (www.epi.org). 
              2000. “The benefits for widows and divorced women that Social 
              Security provides will not necessarily be available in a system 
              of individual accounts.” Policy 
              brief, 2 pages in PDF 
            Why 
              Social Security Is a Better Deal than Privatization  
              for Women and Their Families 
              Fact Sheet from the National Women’s Law Center (www.nwlc.org). 
              2002. Diverting revenue out of Social Security and into private 
              accounts …would double the size of the shortfall, require 
              deep cuts in guarawnteed benefits, and jeopardize the financial 
              security of generations of women and their families.” 1 page in PDF  
            Also from 
              NWLC:  
              Women and Social Security Reform: What’s 
              At Stake 
              2002. An extended fact sheet about Social Security benefits 
              for women.  
              7 pages in PDF 
            Social 
              Security: The Largest Source of Income  
              for Both Women and Men in Retirement 
              Heidi Hartmann and Sunhwa Lee, Institute for Women’s 
              Policy Research (www.iwpr.org), 
              IWPR Publication # D455. Apr 2003. “The vulnerability 
              of women in old age underscores the importance of maintaining a 
              Social Security program that provides secure retirement and survivor 
              benefits fully adjusted to keep up with inflation. Enhancements 
              of Social Security are needed that would better protect divorced 
              women, women and men with disabilities, and those who have always 
              worked for low wages at unstable jobs or had low life-time earnings 
              because of caregiving responsibilities. Improving Social Security 
              benefits for these groups would further reduce poverty among them.” 
              8 pages in PDF 
            The 
              Century Foundation Social Security Network 
              Publications, commentary, resources. www.socsec.org 
            Twelve 
              Reasons Why Privatizing Social Security is a Bad Idea 
              Greg Anrig Jr., Bernard Wasow, The Century Foundation              (www.tcf.org). 
              Dec 2004. “Addressing Social Security’s potential 
              long-term financing challenges by taking the dramatic step of diverting 
              its payroll taxes to create new personal accounts will have drastic 
              consequences for federal finances, future retirees, and those who 
              rely on the system the most. Learn more about twelve major reasons 
              why less costly and less painful reforms should be considered instead.” 
              Issue 
              brief in HTML 
            | top 
              of page | 
             
            Tax 
              Issues 
             Tax 
              Day: How Do America's Child Benefits Compare? 
              The Clearinghouse on International Developments in Child, 
              Youth and Family Policies at Columbia University (www.childpolicyintl.org). 
              2002. “Unlike most other industrialized countries, family 
              benefits for American's with children do not come in a neat package. 
              Applying for tax benefits is more confusing in the United States 
              because it requires that a family be aggressive and savvy enough 
              to understand the tax system. The net effect is that those American 
              families who most need assistance are the least likely to apply 
              or be aware of the benefits, and when they do apply, assistance 
              is likely to come once a year, rather than on a monthly basis”. Issue 
              Brief In HTML or PDF 
            Leave 
              No Child Behind?  
              Nancy Folbre, The American Prospect (www.prospect.org). 
              Jan 01. “The only true way to build an “opportunity 
              society” is to thoroughly reform our current social-insurance 
              and education policies.” Full article in HTML 
            Giving 
              Tax Credit Where Credit Is Due: A ‘Universal Unified Child 
              Credit’ that expands the EITC and cuts taxes for working families 
              Robert Cherry and Max Sawicky, The Economic Policy Institute (www.epi.org). 
              2000. “Nearly one in five American children are in families 
              whose income is below the poverty line. Almost 10 million children 
              lack health insurance coverage and Medicaid benefits. An effective 
              means of helping these children would be a major expansion of the 
              Earned Income Tax Credit that restructures and combines some of 
              the other tax benefits available to families with children.” 
              Policy 
              brief in HTML 
            Making 
              work pay with tax reform 
              Max B. Sawicky and Robert Cherry, The Economic Policy 
              Institute (www.epi.org). 
              Dec 01. “To provide tax relief to families with children, 
              refundable income tax credits tied to earnings and family size are 
              the indispensable remedy. Many families who work and pay payroll 
              taxes see little gain from income tax cuts, and the changes in the 
              tax code passed in 2001 do little to remedy the problem.” 
              Issue 
              brief in HTML 
            Edward 
              J. McCaffery on “Taxing Women” 
              1997. “The United States tax system is a product of the 1930s 
              and 1940s. At that time the single-earner model was the norm for 
              families—men worked outside the home and women worked inside 
              it. Tax policy decisions favored and rewarded this arrangement and 
              made it difficult to be a two-earner family—made it difficult 
              for married women with children to work. Over time those biases 
              have gotten worse, but we haven't really re-examined them.” 
              Interview in HTML 
            Edward 
              J. McCaffery on his book, “Fair Not Flat: 
              How to Make the Tax System Better and Fairer” 
              1997. “Tax is a very political subject. It is also a very 
              big matter— taxes today account for two trillion dollars annually, 
              one-third of our national economy. I devote an entire chapter to 
              a critique of the tax proposal in the Contract with America for 
              a per-child— not child care— credit. That turns out 
              to be a very sophisticated piece of political strategy designed 
              to keep women in the home.” Interview 
              in HTML 
            | top 
            of page |  
           |