| MMO: 
            You’ve described shame as an “intensely painful 
            feeling or experience of believing we are flawed and therefore unworthy 
            of acceptance and belonging” that makes women feel “trapped, 
            powerless and isolated.” You argue that shaming is always 
            counterproductive to healthy personal growth, but note that shame 
            is used as “a way to try to change people… every minute 
            of every day.” If shame doesn’t do the things we expect 
            it to do—in other words, change unwanted behaviors and attitudes— why 
            is it so pervasive? Does shaming have other social or psychological 
            functions? Is there a connection between shaming and the desire to 
            restrict the power of a particular individual or group?  
            
             B Brown:              This is an extremely important question and I want to answer 
              it in pieces. In order to understand shame’s complexities, 
              I need to first explain how shame makes us feel trapped, powerless 
              and isolated. Once we understand these concepts, it’s easier 
              to see why shame is so pervasive and how, regardless of intent, 
              it is very counterproductive to real personal growth and meaningful 
              change.  
            In the four years I spent immersed in this research, one of the 
              most difficult questions to answer was, “What do women’s 
              shame experiences have in common?” Clearly, what triggers 
              shame in some of us has no impact on others. What some of us experience 
              as devastating may feel mildly upsetting for others. Yet, when you 
              read the descriptions and hear the stories of 200 women, it’s 
              very clear that there is something central, something core, in everyone’s 
              experience of shame. For me the primary struggle was to locate and 
              name what fuels and lies beneath all of these incredibly different 
              stories.  
            Here’s what I found. There are no universal shame triggers. 
              There are no events or situations that make all of us feel or experience 
              shame. I discovered that there are, however, categories that are 
              meaningful. Without exception, all of the participants’ shame 
              experiences fit in one of these categories: identity, appearance, 
              sexuality, family, motherhood, parenting, health (mental and physical), 
              aging, religion and a woman’s ability to stand up and speak 
              out for herself. These are the categories in which women struggle 
              the most with feelings of shame. Given our personal diversity and 
              how differently we experience shame, is there a way to explain its 
              impacts that actually includes all of us and is meaningful for all? 
              Surprisingly, the answer is yes. When we experience shame we 
                feel trapped, powerless and isolated. 
            Regardless of who, what, why or how, when women experience shame 
              they feel trapped, powerless and isolated. I think it’s safe 
              to say that each of these concepts is frightening. No one wants 
              to feel trapped, no one wants to feel powerless and most of us dread 
              feeling isolated. But if we understand these three concepts as intricately 
              woven together to create shame, it becomes very clear why shame 
              is so powerful, complex and difficult to overcome. Let’s look 
              at each of these concepts: 
            Trapped: The concept of trapped emerged with two 
              properties: expectations and options. It’s really about the 
              ratio of expectations to options. Think about motherhood. There 
              are hundreds of expectations, but very few realistic options for 
              meeting those expectations available to us. Being trapped is very 
              similar to what Marilyn Frye describes as the “double-bind” 
              – “situations in which options are reduced to a very 
              few and all of them expose one to penalty, censure or deprivation.” 
              The concept of being trapped expands the “double-bind” 
              concept by combining limited and punitive options with layers of 
              competing expectations to form a complex web that traps women.  
            Powerless: Given how most of us are socialized 
              to think about power, I think it’s important to start by defining 
              the concept. When I talk about power in this book, I mean real power. 
              The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines power as “the ability 
              to act or produce an effect.” Power is basically the ability 
              to change something if you want to change it. It’s the ability 
              to make change happen. Real power is not finite—there is plenty 
              to go around. And the great thing about real power is our ability 
              to create it. Real power doesn’t force us to take it away 
              from others—it’s something we create and build with 
              others. It doesn’t force us to pawn the things that are important 
              to us—our families, our womanhood, our identities—it 
              allows us to create those things. 
            When we talk about shame and powerlessness, we’re really 
              talking about three specific components of power: consciousness, 
              choice and change. For women experiencing shame, the ability to 
              produce an effect that could counter shame is very difficult because 
              most of us are unconscious of what we’re feeling and why we’re 
              feeling it. Shame often produces overwhelming and painful feelings 
              of confusion, fear, anger, judgment and/or the need to escape or 
              hide from the situation. It’s difficult to identify shame 
              as the core issue when we’re trying to manage all these very 
              intense feelings. It would be highly unusual to be in the middle 
              of a shaming experience and think, “Oh, I’m aware of 
              what’s happening—this is shame. What are my choices 
              and how can I change this?” Even when we recognize it, the 
              silencing and secret nature of shame makes it very difficult for 
              us to identify and act on the choices that could actually facilitate 
              change or free us from the shame trap. This is what I mean by powerlessness. 
            Isolation: Isolation is the product of being trapped 
              and powerless. When I talk about isolation I don’t mean feeling 
              lonely or alone. Jean Baker Miller and Irene Stiver, Relational-Cultural 
              theorists from the Stone Center at Wellesley College, have beautifully 
              captured the overwhelming nature of isolation. They write, “We 
              believe that the most terrifying and destructive feeling that a 
              person can experience is psychological isolation. This is not the 
              same as being alone. It is a feeling that one is locked out of the 
              possibility of human connection and of being powerless to change 
              the situation. In the extreme, psychological isolation can lead 
              to a sense of hopelessness and desperation. People will do almost 
              anything to escape this combination of condemned isolation and powerlessness.” 
            Given how shame often makes us feel trapped, powerless and isolated, 
              it does not make sense to think of shame as an effective agent for 
              positive, lasting change. Meaningful, healthy change requires us 
              to assess both our strengths and limitations. We change from a place 
              of self-worth, not a place of shame, powerlessness and isolation. 
              Real change requires awareness, insight and thoughtful decision-making 
              – these are rarely present when we are experiencing shame.  
            When we think about “why” we use shame as a change 
              agent even though it is damaging and its long-term impact can often 
              be very destructive to both the person being shamed and the person 
              doing the shaming – parenting serves as a good example. (The 
              further I got into this work the more convinced I became about the 
              need to write something on shame and parenting. At first I was going 
              to write an article, but I have so much data at this point that 
              I’m working on a book). We can actually use shame to turn 
              a child’s behavior on a dime. It is both effective and efficient 
              in the short-term. When we are stressed or run out of parenting 
              tools, it is easy to turn to shame as a way to stop a behavior or 
              force a child to comply with a demand. Once we’ve used shame 
              a couple of times, there appears to be a residual effect. We merely 
              have to threaten to use it or look as if we are going to use it 
              and the child complies.  
            The problem is that the messages we send to the child are often 
              messages that can follow the child for a lifetime. Shaming is not 
              like “guilting.” Guilt says: “you’ve done 
              something bad” or “you’ve made a bad choice.” 
              Shame says: “you are bad.” There is a big difference 
              between “you made a mistake” and “you are a mistake.” 
              Guilt can often inspire us to change a behavior, make amends, apologize 
              or rethink our priorities. When we feel shame, our self-worth is 
              so low that there is little possibility for change. Harriet Lerner 
              writes, “How do we apologize for something we are rather than 
              something we did?” Additionally, the “residual effect” 
              is more accurately a “decaying effect.” When we repeatedly 
              use shame to change people, their self-worth and self-confidence 
              can slowly erode.  
            So, the long answer is that shame is used as a change agent all 
              the time. It’s used in our “here and now” society 
              because you can actually see a swift behavior change when you use 
              shame. The consequences, however, are very serious. Shame promotes 
              change by using fear of rejection, fear of not being accepted and 
              fear of disconnection. Ultimately, shame is very destructive to 
              both the person doing the shaming and the person being shamed. When 
              you talk to 200 women about shame (and now some men as well), you 
              quickly learn how many of our deepest scars are from being shamed 
              and many of our most profound regrets can be traced back to experiences 
              when we shamed others.  
                           
            MMO: “Mother 
              guilt”— the self-doubt and anxiety mothers experience 
              when conflicting social expectations make it impossible to be an 
              “ideal” worker and an “ideal” mother at 
              the same time— is now recognized as a cultural phenomenon. 
              And we’ve all felt embarrassed when we’ve done something 
              clumsy or thoughtless when other people are around. Is there a relationship 
              between shame, guilt and embarrassment? 
            B Brown: I 
              touched on this in the previous question, but let me go into a little 
              more detail. We often use the terms shame, guilt and embarrassment 
              interchangeably. In fact, there are interesting debates about the 
              relationship between shame, guilt and embarrassment. Some researchers 
              believe that all three of these emotions are related and represent 
              varying degrees of the same core emotion. Other researchers believe 
              that the three are separate, distinct experiences. My research clearly 
              supports the argument that shame, guilt and embarrassment are three 
              completely different responses. Here’s how the women in my 
              study distinguished shame and guilt:  
            Guilt = I did 
              something bad. 
              Shame = I am bad. 
            Guilt = That was a flawed 
               decision. 
              Shame = I am flawed. 
             Guilt = That is a bad 
              thought.  
              Shame = I am a bad person 
              for having that thought.               In the simplest terms, 
              shame is about who we are, not what we’ve done. Unlike the 
              paralyzing effects of shame, guilt often prompts us to make amends 
              or change our behavior. Feeling guilty doesn’t produce the 
              same feelings of being trapped, powerless and isolated. Women described 
              “embarrassing situations” as much less serious than 
              either guilt or shame. Embarrassment is, by definition, something 
              that is fleeting, often eventually funny and very normal (e.g., 
              tripping, misspeaking, etc.). Regardless of how embarrassing a situation 
              might be, we know (or at least have heard) that it happens to other 
              people and we know it will go away. On the other hand, shame is 
              often lasting, devastating and makes us feel very abnormal and alone.  |